Abstracts and References


Land or people? On the iatrogenesis of conflation

Mirek Dymitrow, Rene Brauer


In a wish to abandon essentialism to contingency, this paper looks into whether the rural-urban binary could be a cultural burden so incompatible with the layered realities of advanced deprivation that instead of helping the deprived, it deprives the help of its carrying capacity. Departing from the idea that cultural mechanisms are capable of allowing for conceptual dichotomies to create oppression, this paper addresses the concepts of ‘rural’ and ‘urban’ as potentially counterproductive ideas in policy and planning when deployed in areas of severe social deprivation. Using a Swedish example, this problem is addressed in the context of a recently finalized development project, whose focus of approach shifted from ‘urban’ to ‘rural’. We demonstrate how ‘rural’ and ‘urban’ are not neutral spatial qualifiers but problematic filters superimposed onto the already problematic concept of “social sustainability”. Here, we draw on the principle of iatrogenesis, which denotes any benevolent action that inadvertently produces undesired outcomes. We argue that since many areas lack the presumed conceptual foundation for a specific brand of action, development programs labeled as ‘rural’ or ‘urban’ are not only likely to fail, but also to potentially cause harm. We conclude that more context-sensitive understanding of the human condition beyond inflexible labeling is needed in order to arrive at more adequate interventions.

Keywords: urban, rural, development program, social deprivation, unintended harm.

Acta Geobalcanica, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp. 63-75, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18509/AGB.2016.07

Full Text PDF

Available Online First: 26 July 2016


[1] Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence: An anthropology of the moderns. Harvard University Press.

[2] Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Blackwell.

[3] Dennett, D.C. (1993). Consciousness explained. Penguin.

[4] Woods, M. (2010). Rural. Routledge.

[5] Cloke, P. (2006). Conceptualizing rurality. In: Cloke, P., Marsden, T., & Mooney, P.H. (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies. Sage, pp. 18–28.

[6] Hubbard, P. (2006). City. Routledge.

[7] Thrift, N. (1993). An urban impasse? Theory, Culture and Society, 10(2), pp. 229–238.

[8] Hoggart, K. (1990). Let's do away with rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(3), pp. 245–257.

[9] Merton, R.K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1(6), pp. 894-904.

[10] Halfacree, K. (2006). Rural space: constructing a three-fold architecture. In: Cloke, P., Marsden, T., & Mooney, P.H. (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies. Sage, pp. 44–62.

[11] Cloke, P., & Johnston, R. (Eds.) (2005). Spaces of geographical thought: Deconstructing human geography's binaries. Sage.

[12] Derrida, J. (1981). Positions. University of Chicago Press.

[13] Somerville, P., Halfacree, K., & Bosworth, G. (2013). Conclusion: Interrogating rural coherence. In: Bosworth, G., & Somerville, P. (Eds.). Interpreting rurality: multidisciplinary approaches. Routledge, pp. 278–296,

[14] Halfacree, K. (2009). Rurality and post-rurality. In: Kitchin, R., & Thrift, N. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier, 1, pp. 449–456.

[15] Brauer, R., & Dymitrow, M. (2014). Quality of life in rural areas: A topic for the Rural Development policy? Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 25, pp. 25–54.

[16] Dahly, D.L., & Adair, L.S. (2007). Quantifying the urban environment: A scale measure of urbanicity outperforms the urban–rural dichotomy. Social Science & Medicine, 64(7), pp. 1407–1419.

[17] Williams, R. (1975). The country and the city. Oxford University Press.

[18] Soja, E.W. (1980). The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2), pp. 207–225.

[19] Stenbacka, S. (2011). Othering the rural: About the construction of rural masculinities and the unspoken urban hegemonic ideal in Swedish media. Journal of Rural Studies, 27(3), pp. 235–244.

[20] Eriksson, M. (2010). “People in Stockholm are smarter than countryside folks” – Reproducing urban and rural imaginaries in film and life. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(2), pp. 95–104.

[21] Dymitrow, M., and Stenseke, M. (2016). Rural-urban blurring and the subjectivity within. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History, 3(2) (in print).

[22] Dymitrow, M. (2014). The effigy of urbanity or a rural parody? A visual approach to small-town public space. Journal of Cultural Geography, 31(1), pp. 1–31.

[23] Fein, S., & von Hippel, W. (2003). Stereotypes. In: Nadel, L. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Macmillan, 4, pp. 232–238.

[24] Ulied, A., Biosca, O., & Rodrigo, R. (2010). Urban and rural narratives and spatial development trends in Europe. Mcrit.

[25] Ward, N., & Brown, D.L. (2009). Placing the rural in regional development. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1237–1244.

[26] Sharpe, V.A., & Faden, A.I. (1998). Medical harm: Historical, conceptual, and ethical dimensions of iatrogenic illness. Cambridge University Press.

[27] Taleb, N.N. (2013). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. Penguin.

[28] Foucault, M. (1988 [1960]). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. Vintage.

[29] Smart, B. (2015). Concepts and causes in the philosophy of disease. Palgrave Macmillan.

[30] Žižek, S. (1991). For they know not what they do: Enjoyment as a political factor. Vintage

[31] Boisvert, C.M., & Faust, D. (2002). Iatrogenic symptoms in psychotherapy: A theoretical exploration of the potential impact of labels, language, and belief systems. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 56(2), pp. 244–259.

[32] Meadows D.H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Earthscan.

[33] O’Brien, K. (2013). Global environmental change III: Closing the gap between knowledge and action. Progress in Human Geography, 37(4), pp. 587–596.

[34] Jones, O. (2009). Nature-culture. In: Kitchin, R., & Thrift, N. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier, 1, pp. 309–323.

[35] Kegan, R., & Lahey, L.L. (2009). Immunity to change: How to overcome it and unlock the potential in yourself and your organization. Harvard Business Press.

[36] Dahlberg, A. (2015). Categories are all around us: Towards more porous, flexible, and negotiable boundaries in conservation-production landscapes. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 69(4), pp. 207–218.

[37] Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1996). The nature of human concepts: Evidence from an unusual source. Communication and Cognition, 29(3/4), pp. 307–336.

[38] Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (Eds.) (1999). Concepts: Core readings. MIT Press.

[39] Freibach-Heifetz, D., & Stopler, G. (2008). On conceptual dichotomies and social oppression. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 34(5), pp. 515–535.

[40] Scholz, S.J. (1995). The public/private dichotomy in systemic oppression. Journal for Peace and Justice Studies, 6(1), pp. 1–14.

[41] Bourdieu, P. (Ed.) (1993). La misère du monde. Seuil.

[42] Amin, A., Massey, D.B., & Thrift, N.J. (2000). Cities for the many, not the few. The Policy Press.

[43] Woodward, R. (1996). 'Deprivation' and 'the rural': An investigation into contradictory discourses. Journal of Rural Studies, 12(1), pp. 55–67.

[44] Woods, M. (2010). Performing rurality and practising rural geography. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), pp. 835–846.

[45] Butler, J. (2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), pp.147–161.

[46] Saïd, E.W. (1978). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient. Penguin.

[47] Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Routledge.

[48] Van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Elite discourse and racism. Sage.

[49] Pile, S. (1994). Masculinism, the use of dualistic epistemologies and third space. Antipode, 26(3), pp. 255–77.

[50] Sanandaji, T. (2012). Poverty and causality. Critical Review, 24(1), pp. 51–59.

[51] Siwe, M. (2015). Hellre poliser än kameler i förorten. Expressen, 20 July 2015.

[52] Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.

[53] Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526.

[54] Gibson-Graham, J.K., & Roelvink, G. (2010). An economic ethics for the Anthropocene. In: Castree, N., Chatterton, P.A., Heynen, N., Larner, W., & Wright, M.W. (Eds.), The point is to change it: Geographies of hope and survival in an age of crisis. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 320–346.

[55] Thrift, N. (2009). Space: the fundamental stuff of geography. In: Clifford, N., Holloway, S., Rice, S.P., & Valentine, G. (Eds.), Key concepts in geography. Sage, pp. 85–96.